Healthcare Ai

5 posts

google3 min readCurated summary

SensorFM: Towards a general intelligence and interface for wearable health data

SensorFM is a large foundation model designed to turn wearable-device signals into a reusable representation of human physiology. Trained on more than one trillion minutes of multimodal data from five million people, it performs well across 35 health-related prediction tasks while requiring relatively few labeled examples. The authors argue that scaling both data and model size enables a general-purpose interface for wearable health data rather than isolated, task-specific models. ## The challenge of wearable health data - Wearables continuously capture heart rate, movement, temperature, blood oxygen, sleep, and related signals. - Interpreting these measurements is difficult because: - Baseline physiology and lifestyle vary substantially between individuals. - Reliable labels such as diagnoses, lab results, and validated questionnaires are costly and difficult to collect. - Traditional models usually target one health outcome at a time and generalize poorly. ## Training on more than a trillion minutes - SensorFM was trained on de-identified data from five million consenting participants collected between September 2024 and September 2025. - The dataset includes: - More than 100 countries and all 50 U.S. states. - Over 20 Fitbit and Pixel Watch models. - More than two billion sensor-hours of data. - The model processes 34 minute-level features from: - PPG - Accelerometry - Electrodermal activity - Skin temperature - Altimetry - These signals represent heart rate, heart-rate variability, blood oxygen, sleep, movement, skin conductance, and temperature across full days. ## Learning from incomplete sensor recordings - SensorFM uses self-supervised masked reconstruction rather than relying on medical labels. - Its Adaptive and Inherited Masking framework treats naturally missing data as part of the learning problem. - This avoids: - Imputing gaps, which can introduce bias. - Discarding incomplete windows, which wastes real-world data. - The resulting representation is explicitly aware of missingness and can learn from fragmented wearable recordings. ## Scaling data and model capacity - Experiments varied training data from roughly two million to two billion sensor-hours and model size from 100,000 to 100 million parameters. - Larger models trained on more data consistently improved both reconstruction and downstream health prediction. - The largest model: - Reduced reconstruction loss by 31% compared with the smallest version. - Improved classification performance by an average of 9% in AUC. - Improved regression performance by 21% in Pearson correlation. - Won on 33 of 35 downstream tasks. - Scaling data and model size together produced near-linear gains with no observed saturation. ## One representation across many health domains - SensorFM was tested on 35 tasks from three prospective studies involving 13,985 participants. - The tasks covered: - Cardiovascular health - Metabolic risk - Mental health - Sleep - Demographics - Lifestyle - With the encoder frozen and only a lightweight linear head trained, SensorFM embeddings outperformed engineered-feature supervised baselines on 34 of 35 tasks. - Larger models appeared to learn physiologically relevant demographic and individual differences without being explicitly given demographic inputs. - The model showed particular value for difficult-to-measure conditions such as depression and anxiety. - It also reached strong performance with relatively small quantities of labeled data, addressing a major constraint in healthcare modeling. ## Automated adaptation through an agentic “classroom” - The authors introduce a collaborative system of LLM agents intended to automate the creation of prediction heads. - This approach aims to reduce the manual work traditionally required for: - Feature engineering - Architecture selection - Hyperparameter tuning - The supplied article excerpt ends while introducing this system, so its detailed workflow and results are not described here. SensorFM demonstrates that large-scale, missingness-aware pre-training can produce a broadly useful representation of wearable physiology. Its strongest practical promise is label-efficient adaptation across many health applications, potentially providing a foundation for personalized health agents and more general wearable-data interfaces.

Read original(opens in new tab)
google3 min readCurated summary

Research into how AI can help users understand skin conditions

Google Research examined how AI tools can help non-experts understand skin conditions and decide what to do next. In a large study, AI substantially improved people’s ability to identify possible conditions, but it did not reliably improve the accuracy of recommended next steps. The research therefore argues that dermatology AI should be designed around human decision-making, safety, and clear guidance—not diagnosis alone. ## Why Dermatology AI Needs Human-Centered Research - More than half of adults use the Internet for health information, and about one-third use AI. - People often lack the medical vocabulary needed to search effectively—for example, searching for “red dots on legs” instead of “palpable purpura.” - Google Research has developed dermatology AI models, validated their generalization, and released datasets such as SCIN. - Earlier research found that online tools can improve condition recognition without necessarily helping people choose appropriate next steps. - The researchers emphasize studying how people interpret and act on AI-generated information. ## Large-Scale Evaluation of an AI Information Tool - A JAMA Dermatology study involved 2,345 participants reviewing de-identified skin-condition cases with images and structured medical histories. - Participants were assigned to one of three groups: - **Standard-search control:** Used familiar text-based search tools. - **AI group:** Used a prototype showing 3–7 AI-predicted conditions, textbook images, and information about symptoms and treatments. - **“Wizard of Oz” control:** Used the same interface, but with dermatologist-provided differential diagnoses presented as if generated by AI. - The AI interface increased participants’ willingness to name a condition: - More than 62% attempted a diagnosis with AI. - Only 41% did so using standard search. - Accuracy also improved: - AI users correctly identified a matching condition about 23% of the time. - Standard-search users achieved 8%. - The “perfect-prediction” interface reached 36%, showing that even accurate candidate lists did not make users nearly perfect. - AI users reported greater confidence, satisfaction, and satisfaction with the time spent searching. ## Identifying a Condition Does Not Guarantee Safe Action - The prototype intentionally avoided prescribing actions or making individualized diagnoses. - Treatment information was dermatologist-written and based on the condition name, rather than the severity or details of the specific case. - Choosing the right next step—such as home care, routine care, or urgent evaluation—remained difficult. - Next-step accuracy improved only slightly in the “Wizard of Oz” group, from 60% in the standard-search control to 63.5%. - The standard AI group showed no statistically significant improvement. - AI users were slightly more likely than control participants to recommend a less urgent action than dermatologists would: 30% versus 27%. - These findings show that identifying possible conditions is insufficient without stronger safety-oriented guidance. ## Studying Real Users and Diverse Communities - The researchers also conducted a qualitative study, published at ACM CHI, to examine how people use AI for their own active skin concerns. - The project partnered with Stanford’s Healthcare AI Applied Research Team and the Santa Clara Family Health Plan. - The community included many Medi-Cal users who rely on a healthcare safety net. - Researchers aimed to gather richer feedback than survey-based studies provide by observing real-world use. - Because participants spoke four primary languages, the application was translated into those languages, with multilingual volunteers or staff available to support communication. AI can make dermatology information easier to find and improve recognition of possible conditions, but it should not be treated as a substitute for professional judgment. Future tools should focus equally on urgency assessment, personalized context, uncertainty, and clear recommendations for when to seek medical care.

Read original(opens in new tab)
google3 min readCurated summary

Catalyzing scientific impact through global partnerships and open resources

Google Research argues that scientific breakthroughs have the greatest impact when their software, datasets, and methods are openly shared and responsibly maintained through global partnerships. Its open-science efforts span genomics, neuroscience, climate, biodiversity, and healthcare, reaching more than 250,000 researchers and developers. The post concludes that collaboration and open resources can turn individual discoveries into tools for broader scientific progress and real-world benefits. ## Partnerships Across the Scientific Ecosystem - Google Research works with organizations including UCSC’s Genomics Institute, Janelia Research Campus, ISTA, CSIRO, AIIMS, and the Centre for Population Genomics. - It supports major international initiatives such as: - The Human Pangenome Research Consortium - The Earth BioGenome Project - The NIH BRAIN Initiative - Google is also developing communities of practice for scientific developers, beginning in India, Korea, Japan, and Australia. ## Open-Source Tools and Datasets - **Genomics** - DeepVariant, DeepConsensus, and DeepPolisher support DNA analysis from sequencing through genome assembly. - These tools have helped process exomes and whole genomes from 2.5 million people. - **Neuroscience** - Flood-filling networks, Neuroglancer, and TensorStore enable analysis and visualization of petascale brain reconstructions. - The public H01 dataset contains 1.4 petabytes of human brain tissue data and has been accessed more than 200,000 times. - MICrONS provides a large wiring and functional map of the mouse visual cortex. - **Earth and Atmospheric Science** - Open Buildings contains 1.8 billion building detections across 58 million square kilometers. - Caravan supports large-scale hydrology and flood forecasting in 150 countries, covering roughly 2 billion people. - Groundsource includes 2.6 million historical urban flood events from more than 150 countries. - NeuralGCM is a differentiable hybrid atmospheric model, while FireBench supports wildfire research with high-resolution synthetic data. - **Biodiversity** - SpeciesNet classifies 2,498 animal categories in wildlife-camera images. - **Healthcare** - HAI-DEF provides open-weight medical foundation models, including MedGemma, with more than 4.8 million downloads. - Open Health Stack offers secure, offline-capable tools based on modern healthcare standards. - OHS-powered applications have reached more than 65 million people across over 10 countries. ## Scientific and Humanitarian Impact - **Genomics** - Work with UCSC improved pangenome references and reduced genetic-variant identification errors by 50%. - The research contributes to more representative genomic resources through the Human Pangenome Research Consortium. - **Weather and Agriculture** - The University of Chicago’s Human-Centered Weather Forecasts Initiative used NeuralGCM and ECMWF systems to predict India’s monsoon onset up to a month ahead. - Forecasts, including an unusual dry spell, were delivered by SMS to 38 million Indian farmers to support planting decisions. - **Disaster Response** - UNHCR and other organizations use Open Buildings to improve survey sampling for displaced populations. - The dataset also supports research into building vulnerability to sea-level rise in the Global South. - Sunbird AI uses the data to assess energy needs in urban and rural communities. - **Neuroscience and Medicine** - Johns Hopkins researchers used the H01 brain dataset to identify a possible new form of neuronal communication, suggesting that current models of brain organization may be incomplete. - The finding could have implications for understanding conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease. - Google also partnered with Stanford Medicine and UCSC to accelerate genome analysis in urgent cases of suspected genetic disease. ## Practical Conclusion The post presents open-source scientific infrastructure, accessible datasets, and cross-border partnerships as essential to accelerating discovery. Researchers and institutions can maximize impact by sharing reproducible tools, maintaining resources collaboratively, and applying them to urgent global challenges.

Read original(opens in new tab)
google3 min readCurated summary

Collaborating on a nationwide randomized study of AI in real-world virtual care

Google and Included Health plan to launch, pending IRB approval, a nationwide randomized study of conversational AI in real-world virtual care. Unlike prior simulated or small feasibility studies, it will prospectively evaluate AI with consented patients across varied conditions and locations, comparing it with standard clinical practice. The goal is to generate rigorous evidence about safety, usefulness, limitations, and impact on patients and clinicians. ## Moving from Simulation to Real-World Evaluation - Earlier research demonstrated clinician-level capabilities in simulated consultations and retrospective analyses. - A feasibility study with Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center began testing conversational AI in clinical workflows, using measures such as safety-supervisor interruptions. - The new study will advance beyond feasibility through: - A randomized controlled design - Nationwide recruitment - Consented participants - Real patients, clinical concerns, and virtual-care workflows - Controlled comparison with standard practice ## A Phased Approach to Medical AI Research - Google argues that medical AI should be evaluated with evidence standards similar to other medical interventions. - Each research phase adds information about: - Patient and clinician experiences - Safety - Usefulness - The AI system’s capabilities and limitations - Results from each stage are intended to guide safer, more responsible development and deployment. ## Foundational Research Behind the Study ### Diagnostic and Management Reasoning - The AMIE system was developed to handle medical interviews and clinical reasoning. - Studies with patient actors and synthetic cases found that AMIE could match or exceed primary care physicians in simulated diagnostic accuracy and conversation quality. - Later work expanded the system to: - Longitudinal disease management - Clinical-guideline and patient-history reasoning - Investigation and treatment planning - Interpretation of multimodal evidence ### Personalized Health Insights - Research on the Personal Health Agent examined how AI could interpret personal health data, including sleep and activity information from wearables. - Its multi-agent architecture combined the roles of: - Data scientist - Medical domain expert - Health coach - This work informed Fitbit Labs tools such as Symptom Checker and Medical Records Navigator and Plan for Care. ### Navigating Health Information - Google’s “wayfinding” AI research explored how conversational agents can help people find and understand health information. - The system uses proactive guidance, goal recognition, and tailored conversations to make health information searches more practical and useful. ## Practical Conclusion The partnership with Included Health represents a transition from demonstrating what medical AI can do in controlled environments to measuring how it performs at scale in actual care. A nationwide randomized trial could provide the evidence needed to determine whether conversational AI can safely improve virtual care and expand access to medical expertise.

Read original(opens in new tab)
googleOriginal article

Google Research at Google I/O 2025 (opens in new tab)

Google Research at I/O 2025 showcases the "research to reality" transition, highlighting how years of foundational breakthroughs are now being integrated into Gemini models and specialized products. By focusing on multimodal capabilities, pedagogy, and extreme model efficiency, Google aims to democratize access to advanced AI while ensuring it remains grounded and useful across global contexts. ## Specialized Healthcare Models: MedGemma and AMIE * **MedGemma:** This new open model, based on Gemma 3, is optimized for multimodal medical tasks such as radiology image analysis and clinical data summarization. It is available in 4B and 27B sizes, performing similarly to much larger models on the MedQA benchmark while remaining small enough for efficient local fine-tuning. * **AMIE (Articulate Medical Intelligence Explorer):** A research AI agent designed for diagnostic medical reasoning. Its latest multimodal version can now interpret and reason about visual medical information, such as skin lesions or medical imaging, to assist clinicians in diagnostic accuracy. ## Educational Optimization through LearnLM * **Gemini 2.5 Pro Integration:** The LearnLM family of models, developed with educational experts, is now integrated into Gemini 2.5 Pro. This fine-tuning enhances STEM reasoning, multimodal understanding, and pedagogical feedback. * **Interactive Learning Tools:** A new research-optimized quiz experience allows students to generate custom assessments from their own notes, providing specific feedback on right and wrong answers rather than just providing solutions. * **Global Assessment Pilots:** Through partnerships like the one with Kayma, Google is testing the automatic assessment of short and long-form content in regions like Ghana to scale quality educational tools. ## Multilingual Expansion and On-Device Gemma Models * **Gemma 3 and 3n:** Research breakthroughs have expanded Gemma 3’s support to over 140 languages. The introduction of **Gemma 3n** targets extreme efficiency, capable of running on devices with as little as 2GB of RAM while maintaining low latency and low energy consumption. * **ECLeKTic Benchmark:** To assist the developer community, Google introduced this novel benchmark specifically for evaluating how well large language models transfer knowledge across different languages. ## Model Efficiency and Factuality in Search * **Inference Techniques:** Google Research continues to set industry standards for model speed and accessibility through technical innovations like **speculative decoding** and **cascades**, which reduce the computational cost of generating high-quality responses. * **Grounded Outputs:** Significant focus remains on factual consistency, ensuring that the AI models powering features like AI Overviews in Search provide reliable and grounded information to users. As Google continues to shrink the gap between laboratory breakthroughs and consumer products, the emphasis remains on making high-performance AI accessible on low-cost hardware and across diverse linguistic landscapes. Developers and researchers can now leverage these specialized tools via platforms like HuggingFace and Vertex AI to build more targeted, efficient applications.