Efficient Optimization With Ax, an Open Platform for Adaptive Experimentation - Engineering at Meta (opens in new tab)

Meta has released Ax 1.0, an open-source platform designed to automate and optimize complex, resource-intensive experimentation through machine learning. By utilizing Bayesian optimization, the platform helps researchers navigate vast configuration spaces to improve AI models, infrastructure, and hardware design efficiently. The release aims to bridge the gap between sophisticated mathematical theory and the practical requirements of production-scale engineering. ## Real-World Experimentation and Utility * Ax is used extensively at Meta for diverse tasks, including tuning hyperparameter configurations, discovering optimal data mixtures for Generative AI, and optimizing compiler flags. * The platform is built to handle the logistical "overhead" of experimentation, such as managing experiment states, automating orchestration, and providing diagnostic tools. * It supports multi-objective optimization, allowing users to balance competing metrics and enforce "guardrail" constraints rather than just maximizing a single value. * Applications extend beyond software to physical engineering, such as optimizing design parameters for AR/VR hardware. ## System Insight and Analysis * Beyond finding optimal points, Ax serves as a diagnostic tool to help researchers understand the underlying behavior of their systems. * It includes built-in visualizations for Pareto frontiers, which illustrate the trade-offs between different metrics. * Sensitivity analysis tools identify which specific input parameters have the greatest impact on the final results. * The platform provides automated plots and tables to track optimization progress and visualize the effect of parameters across the entire input space. ## Technical Methodology and Architecture * Ax utilizes Bayesian optimization, an iterative approach that balances "exploration" (sampling new areas) with "exploitation" (refining known good areas). * The platform relies on **BoTorch** for its underlying Bayesian components and typically employs **Gaussian processes (GP)** as surrogate models. * GPs are preferred because they can make accurate predictions and quantify uncertainty even when provided with very few data points. * The system uses an **Expected Improvement (EI)** acquisition function to calculate the potential value of new configurations compared to the current best-known result. * This surrogate-based approach is designed to scale to high-dimensional settings involving hundreds of tunable parameters where traditional search methods are too costly. To begin implementing these methods, developers can install the platform via `pip install ax-platform`. Ax 1.0 provides a robust framework for moving cutting-edge optimization research directly into production environments.

Real-time speech-to-speech translation (opens in new tab)

Google DeepMind and Google Core ML have developed an innovative end-to-end speech-to-speech translation (S2ST) model that enables real-time, voice-preserved communication with only a two-second delay. By replacing traditional cascaded pipelines with a streaming architecture trained on time-synchronized data, the system overcomes long-standing issues of high latency and accumulated errors. This advancement represents a significant shift toward natural, fluid cross-language dialogue that retains the original speaker's personality. ## Limitations of Cascaded S2ST Traditional real-time translation systems typically rely on a cascaded chain of three distinct AI models: Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR), Automatic Speech Translation (AST), and Text-to-Speech (TTS). This approach suffers from several critical drawbacks: * **High Latency:** Processing through three separate stages results in a 4–5 second delay, forcing users into unnatural, turn-based interactions. * **Error Propagation:** Inaccuracies in the initial transcription or translation phase accumulate, often leading to garbled or incorrect final audio output. * **Loss of Identity:** General-purpose TTS engines generate generic voices, stripping the communication of the original speaker’s unique vocal characteristics. ## Time-Synced Data Acquisition Pipeline To train an end-to-end model capable of low-latency output, researchers created a scalable pipeline that transforms raw audio into a specialized time-synchronized dataset. * **Alignment Multi-mapping:** The process uses forced alignment algorithms to map source audio to source text, source text to translated text, and finally, translated text to generated speech. * **Voice Preservation:** A custom TTS engine generates the target language audio while intentionally preserving the vocal characteristics of the original speaker. * **Strict Validation:** Automated filters discard any segments where alignments fail or where the translated audio cannot meet specific real-time delay requirements. * **Data Augmentation:** The training set is further refined using techniques such as sample rate reduction, denoising, and reverberation to ensure the model performs well in real-world environments. ## End-to-End Streaming Architecture The model’s architecture is designed for continuous audio streams, leveraging the AudioLM framework and fundamental transformer blocks to make real-time decisions. * **Streaming Encoder:** This component summarizes source audio data by focusing on the preceding 10-second window of input. * **Streaming Decoder:** This module predicts translated audio autoregressively, utilizing compressed encoder states and previous predictions to maintain flow. * **RVQ Audio Tokens:** The system represents audio as a 2D set of Residual Vector Quantization (RVQ) tokens, where the X-axis represents time and the Y-axis represents audio quality/fidelity. * **SpectroStream Integration:** By using SpectroStream codec technology, the model manages hierarchical audio representations, allowing it to prioritize the sequential output of audio segments for immediate playback. This technology effectively bridges the gap between high-quality translation and real-time responsiveness. For developers and researchers in the field, the transition from modular cascaded systems to end-to-end streaming architectures—supported by rigorous time-aligned datasets—is the recommended path for achieving truly seamless human-to-human cross-language communication.

Generative UI: A rich, custom, visual interactive user experience for any prompt (opens in new tab)

Google Research has introduced a novel Generative UI framework that enables AI models to dynamically construct bespoke, interactive user experiences—including web pages, games, and functional tools—in response to any natural language prompt. This shift from static, predefined interfaces to AI-generated environments allows for highly customized digital spaces that adapt to a user's specific intent and context. Evaluated through human testing, these custom-generated interfaces are strongly preferred over traditional, text-heavy LLM outputs, signaling a fundamental evolution in human-computer interaction. ### Product Integration in Gemini and Google Search The technology is currently being deployed as an experimental feature across Google’s main AI consumer platforms to enhance how users visualize and interact with data. * **Dynamic View and Visual Layout:** These experiments in the Gemini app use agentic coding capabilities to design and code a complete interactive response for every prompt. * **AI Mode in Google Search:** Available for Google AI Pro and Ultra subscribers, this feature uses Gemini 3’s multimodal understanding to build instant, bespoke interfaces for complex queries. * **Contextual Customization:** The system differentiates between user needs, such as providing a simplified interface for a child learning about the microbiome versus a data-rich layout for an adult. * **Task-Specific Tools:** Beyond text, the system generates functional applications like fashion advisors, event planners, and science simulations for topics like RNA transcription. ### Technical Architecture and Implementation The Generative UI implementation relies on a multi-layered approach centered around the Gemini 3 Pro model to ensure the generated code is both functional and accurate. * **Tool Access:** The model is connected to server-side tools, including image generation and real-time web search, to enrich the UI with external data. * **System Instructions:** Detailed guidance provides the model with specific goals, formatting requirements, and technical specifications to avoid common coding errors. * **Agentic Coding:** The model acts as both a designer and a developer, writing the necessary code to render the UI on the fly based on its interpretation of the user’s prompt. * **Post-Processing:** Outputs undergo a series of automated checks to address common issues and refine the final visual experience before it reaches the browser. ### The Shift from Static to Generative Interfaces This research represents a move away from the traditional software paradigm where users must navigate a fixed catalog of applications to find the tool they need. * **Prompt-Driven UX:** Interfaces are generated from prompts as simple as a single word or as complex as multi-paragraph instructions. * **Interactive Comprehension:** By building simulations on the fly, the system creates a dynamic environment optimized for deep learning and task completion. * **Preference Benchmarking:** Research indicates that when generation speed is excluded as a factor, users significantly prefer these custom-built visual tools over standard, static AI responses. To experience this new paradigm, users can select the "Thinking" option from the model menu in Google Search’s AI Mode or engage with the Dynamic View experiment in the Gemini app to generate tailored tools for specific learning or productivity tasks.

Introduction to OpenTelemetry (feat. Collector (opens in new tab)

NAVER is transitioning its internal search monitoring platform, SEER, to an architecture built on OpenTelemetry and open-source standards to achieve a more scalable and flexible observability environment. By adopting a vendor-agnostic approach, the engineering team aims to unify the collection of metrics, logs, and traces while contributing back to the global OpenTelemetry ecosystem. This shift underscores the importance of standardized telemetry protocols in managing complex, large-scale service infrastructures. ### Standardizing Observability with OTLP * The transition focuses on the OpenTelemetry Protocol (OTLP) as the primary standard for transmitting telemetry data across the platform. * Moving away from proprietary formats allows for a unified data model that encompasses metrics, traces, and logs, ensuring consistency across different services. * A standardized protocol simplifies the integration of various open-source backends, reducing the engineering overhead associated with supporting multiple telemetry formats. ### The OpenTelemetry Collector Pipeline * The Collector acts as a critical intermediary, decoupling the application layer from the storage backend to provide greater architectural flexibility. * **Receivers** are used to ingest data from diverse sources, supporting both OTLP-native applications and legacy systems. * **Processors** enable data transformation, filtering, and metadata enrichment (such as adding resource attributes) before the data reaches its destination. * **Exporters** manage the delivery of processed telemetry to specific backends like Prometheus for metrics or Jaeger for tracing, allowing for easy swaps of infrastructure components. ### Automated Management via OpenTelemetry Operator * The OpenTelemetry Operator is utilized within Kubernetes environments to automate the deployment and lifecycle management of the Collector. * It facilitates auto-instrumentation, allowing developers to collect telemetry from applications without manual code changes for every service. * The Operator ensures that the observability stack scales dynamically alongside the production workloads it monitors. ### Open-Source Contribution and Community * Beyond mere adoption, the NAVER engineering team actively participates in the OpenTelemetry community by sharing bug fixes and feature enhancements discovered during the SEER migration. * This collaborative approach ensures that the specific requirements of high-traffic enterprise environments are reflected in the evolution of the OpenTelemetry project. Adopting OpenTelemetry is a strategic move for organizations looking to avoid vendor lock-in and build a future-proof monitoring stack. For a successful implementation, teams should focus on mastering the Collector's pipeline configuration to balance data granularity with processing performance across distributed systems.

Collecting Custom Metrics with Te (opens in new tab)

This technical session from NAVER ENGINEERING DAY 2025 details the transition from traditional open-source exporters to a Telegraf-based architecture for collecting custom system metrics. By evaluating various monitoring tools through rigorous benchmarking, the developers demonstrate how Telegraf provides a more flexible and high-performance framework for infrastructure observability. The presentation concludes that adopting Telegraf streamlines the metric collection pipeline and offers superior scalability for complex, large-scale service environments. ### Context and Motivation for Open-Source Exporters * The project originated from the need to overcome the limitations of standard open-source exporters that lacked support for specific internal business logic. * Engineers sought a unified way to collect diverse data points without managing dozens of fragmented, single-purpose agents. * The primary goal was to find a solution that could handle high-frequency data ingestion while maintaining low resource overhead on production servers. ### Benchmark Testing for Metric Collection * A comparative analysis was conducted between several open-source monitoring agents to determine their efficiency under load. * Testing focused on critical performance indicators, including CPU and memory footprint during peak metric throughput. * The results highlighted Telegraf's stability and consistent performance compared to other exporter-based alternatives, leading to its selection as the primary collection tool. ### Telegraf Architecture and Customization * Telegraf operates as a plugin-driven agent, utilizing four distinct categories: Input, Processor, Aggregator, and Output plugins. * The development team shared their experience writing custom exporters by leveraging Telegraf’s modular Go-based framework. * This approach allowed for the seamless transformation of raw data into various formats (such as Prometheus or InfluxDB) using a single, unified configuration. ### Operational Gains and Technical Options * Post-implementation, the system saw a significant reduction in operational complexity by consolidating various metric streams into a single agent. * Specific Telegraf options were utilized to fine-tune the collection interval and batch size, optimizing the balance between data granularity and network load. * The migration improved the reliability of metric delivery through built-in retry mechanisms and internal buffers that prevent data loss during transient network failures. For teams currently managing a sprawling array of open-source exporters, migrating to a Telegraf-based architecture is recommended to centralize metric collection. The plugin-based system not only reduces the maintenance burden but also provides the necessary extensibility to support specialized custom metrics as service requirements evolve.

Replacing a DB CDC replication tool that processes (opens in new tab)

Naver Pay successfully transitioned its core database replication system from a legacy tool to "ergate," a high-performance CDC (Change Data Capture) solution built on Apache Flink and Spring. This strategic overhaul was designed to improve maintainability for backend developers while resolving rigid schema dependencies that previously caused operational bottlenecks. By leveraging a modern stream-processing architecture, the system now manages massive transaction volumes with sub-second latency and enhanced reliability. ### Limitations of the Legacy System * **Maintenance Barriers:** The previous tool, mig-data, was written in pure Java by database core specialists, making it difficult for standard backend developers to maintain or extend. * **Strict Schema Dependency:** Developers were forced to follow a rigid DDL execution order (Target DB before Source DB) to avoid replication halts, complicating database operations. * **Blocking Failures:** Because the legacy system prioritized bi-directional data integrity, a single failed record could stall the entire replication pipeline for a specific shard. * **Operational Risk:** Recovery procedures were manual and restricted to a small group of specialized personnel, increasing the time-to-recovery during outages. ### Technical Architecture and Stack * **Apache Flink (LTS 2.0.0):** Selected for its high-availability, low-latency, and native Kafka integration, allowing the team to focus on replication logic rather than infrastructure. * **Kubernetes Session Mode:** Used to manage 12 concurrent jobs (6 replication, 6 verification) through a single Job Manager endpoint for streamlined monitoring and deployment. * **Hybrid Framework Approach:** The team isolated high-speed replication logic within Flink while using Spring (Kotlin) for complex recovery modules to leverage developer familiarity. * **Data Pipeline:** The system captures MySQL binlogs via `nbase-cdc`, publishes them to Kafka, and uses Flink `jdbc-sink` jobs to apply changes to Target DBs (nBase-T and Oracle). ### Three-Tier Operational Model: Replication, Verification, and Recovery * **Real-time Replication:** Processes incoming Kafka records and appends custom metadata columns (`ergate_yn`, `rpc_time`) to track the replication source and original commit time. * **Delayed Verification:** A dedicated "verifier" Flink job consumes the same Kafka topic with a 2-minute delay to check Target DB consistency against the source record. * **Secondary Logic:** To prevent false positives from rapid updates, the verifier performs a live re-query of the Source DB if a mismatch is initially detected. * **Multi-Stage Recovery:** * **Automatic Short-term:** Retries transient failures after 5 minutes. * **Automatic Long-term:** Uses batch processes to resolve persistent discrepancies. * **Manual:** Provides an admin interface for developers to trigger targeted reconciliations via API. ### Improvements in Schema Management and Performance * **DDL Independence:** By implementing query and schema caching, ergate allows Source and Target tables to be updated in any order without halting the pipeline. * **Performance Scaling:** The new system is designed to handle 10x the current peak QPS, ensuring stability even during high-traffic events like major sales or promotions. * **Metadata Tracking:** The inclusion of specific replication identifiers allows for clear distinction between automated replication and manual force-sync actions during troubleshooting. The ergate project demonstrates that a hybrid architecture—combining the high-throughput processing of Apache Flink with the robust logic handling of Spring—is highly effective for mission-critical financial systems. Organizations managing large-scale data replication should consider decoupling complex recovery logic from the main processing stream to ensure both performance and developer productivity.

How and Why Netflix Built a Real-Time Distributed Graph: Part 1 — Ingesting and Processing Data Streams at Internet Scale | by Netflix Technology Blog | Netflix TechBlog (opens in new tab)

Netflix has developed a Real-Time Distributed Graph (RDG) to unify member interaction data across its expanding business verticals, including streaming, live events, and mobile gaming. By transitioning from siloed microservice data to a graph-based model, the company can perform low-latency, relationship-centric queries that were previously hindered by expensive manual joins and data fragmentation. The resulting system enables Netflix to track user journeys across various devices and platforms in real-time, providing a foundation for deeper personalization and pattern detection. ### Challenges of Data Isolation in Microservices * While Netflix’s microservices architecture facilitates independent scaling and service decomposition, it inherently leads to data isolation where each service manages its own storage. * Data scientists and engineers previously had to "stitch" together disparate data from various databases and the central data warehouse, which was a slow and manual process. * The RDG moves away from table-based models to a relationship-centric model, allowing for efficient "hops" across nodes without the need for complex denormalization. * This flexibility allows the system to adapt to new business entities (like live sports or games) without requiring massive schema re-architectures. ### Real-Time Ingestion and Normalization * The ingestion layer is designed to capture events from diverse upstream sources, including Change Data Capture (CDC) from databases and request/response logs. * Netflix utilizes its internal data pipeline, Keystone, to funnel these high-volume event streams into the processing framework. * The system must handle "Internet scale" data, ensuring that events from millions of members are captured as they happen to maintain an up-to-date view of the graph. ### Stream Processing with Apache Flink * Netflix uses Apache Flink as the core stream processing engine to handle the transformation of raw events into graph entities. * Incoming data undergoes normalization to ensure a standardized format, regardless of which microservice or business vertical the data originated from. * The pipeline performs data enrichment, joining incoming streams with auxiliary metadata to provide a comprehensive context for each interaction. * The final step of the processing layer involves mapping these enriched events into a graph structure of nodes (entities) and edges (relationships), which are then emitted to the system's storage layer. ### Practical Conclusion Organizations operating with a highly decoupled microservices architecture should consider a graph-based ingestion strategy to overcome the limitations of data silos. By leveraging stream processing tools like Apache Flink to build a real-time graph, engineering teams can provide stakeholders with the ability to discover hidden relationships and cross-domain insights that are often lost in traditional data warehouses.

Code Quality Improvement Techniques Part 23 (opens in new tab)

While early returns are a popular technique for clarifying code by handling error cases first, they should not be applied indiscriminately. This blog post argues that when error cases and normal cases share the same logic, integrating them into a single flow is often superior to branching. By treating edge cases as part of the standard execution path, developers can simplify their code and reduce unnecessary complexity. ### Unifying Edge Cases with Normal Logic Rather than treating every special condition as an error to be excluded via an early return, it is often more effective to design logic that naturally accommodates these cases. * For functions processing lists, standard collection operations like `map` or `filter` already handle empty collections without requiring explicit checks. * Integrating edge cases can lead to more concise code, though developers should be mindful of minor performance trade-offs, such as the overhead of creating sequence or list instances for empty inputs. * Unification ensures that the "main purpose" of the function remains the focus, rather than a series of guard clauses. ### Utilizing Language-Specific Safety Features Modern programming languages provide built-in operators and functions that allow developers to handle potential errors as part of the standard expression flow. * **Safe Navigation:** Use safe call operators (e.g., `?.`) and null-coalescing operators (e.g., `?:`) to handle null values as normal data flow rather than branching with `if (value == null)`. * **Collection Access:** Instead of manually checking if an index is within bounds, use functions like `getOrNull` or `getOrElse` to retrieve values safely. * **Property Dependencies:** In UI logic, instead of early returning when a string is empty, you can directly assign visibility and text values based on the condition (e.g., `isVisible = text.isNotEmpty()`). ### Functional Exception Handling When a process involves multiple steps that might throw exceptions, traditional early returns can lead to repetitive try-catch blocks and fragmented logic. * By using the `flatMap` pattern and Result-style types, developers can chain operations together. * Converting exceptions into specific error types within a wrapper (like a `Success` or `Error` sealed class) allows the entire sequence to be treated as a unified data flow. * This approach makes the overall business logic much clearer, as the "happy path" is represented by a clean chain of function calls rather than a series of nested or sequential error checks. Before implementing an early return, evaluate whether the edge case can be gracefully integrated into the main logic flow. If the language features or standard libraries allow the normal processing path to handle the edge case naturally, choosing integration over exclusion will result in more maintainable and readable code.

Frontend Code That Lasts (opens in new tab)

Toss Payments evolved its Payment SDK to solve the inherent complexities of integrating payment systems, where developers must navigate UI implementation, security flows, and exception handling. By transitioning from V1 to V2, the team moved beyond simply providing a library to building a robust, architecture-driven system that ensures stability and scalability across diverse merchant environments. The core conclusion is that a successful SDK must be treated as a critical infrastructure layer, relying on modular design and deep observability to handle the unpredictable nature of third-party runtimes. ## The Unique Challenges of SDK Development * SDK code lives within the merchant's runtime environment, meaning it shares the same lifecycle and performance constraints as the merchant’s own code. * Internal logging can inadvertently create bottlenecks; for instance, adding network logs to a frequently called method can lead to "self-DDoS" scenarios that crash the merchant's payment page. * Type safety is a major hurdle, as merchants may pass unexpected data types (e.g., a number instead of a string), causing fatal runtime errors like `startsWith is not a function`. * The SDK acts as a bridge for technical communication, requiring it to function as both an API consumer for internal systems and an API provider for external developers. ## Ensuring Stability through Observability * To manage the unpredictable ways merchants use the SDK, Toss implemented over 300 unit tests and 500 E2E integration tests based on real-world use cases. * The team utilizes a "Global Trace ID" to track a single payment journey across both the frontend and backend, allowing for seamless debugging across the entire system. * A custom Monitoring CLI was developed to compare payment success rates before and after deployments, categorized by merchant and runtime environment (e.g., PC Chrome vs. Android WebView). * This observability infrastructure enables the team to quickly identify edge-case failures—such as a specific merchant's checkout failing only on mobile WebViews—which are often missed by standard QA processes. ## Scaling with Modular Architecture * To avoid "if-statement hell" caused by merchant-specific requirements (e.g., fixing installment months or custom validation for a specific store), Toss moved to a "Lego-block" architecture. * The SDK is organized into three distinct layers based on the "reason for change" principle: * **Public Interface Layer:** Manages the contract with the merchant, validating inputs and translating them into internal domain models. * **Domain Layer:** Encapsulates core business logic and payment policies, keeping them isolated from external changes. * **External Service Layer:** Handles dependencies like Server APIs and Web APIs, ensuring technical shifts don't leak into the business logic. * This separation allows the team to implement custom merchant logic by swapping specific blocks without modifying the core codebase, reducing the risk of regressions and lowering maintenance costs. For developers building SDKs or integration tools, the shift from monolithic logic to a layered, observable architecture is essential. Prioritizing the separation of domain logic from public interfaces and investing in environment-specific monitoring allows for a highly flexible product that remains stable even as the client-side environment grows increasingly complex.

Pushsphere: The Secret to (opens in new tab)

LINE developed Pushsphere to overcome the inherent instability and rate-limiting challenges of delivering high-volume push notifications via providers like APNs and FCM. By implementing a sophisticated gateway architecture rather than relying on naive retry logic, the system ensures reliable delivery even during massive traffic spikes or regional emergencies. This approach has successfully stabilized the messaging pipeline, drastically reducing operational overhead and system-wide failures. ## Limitations of Standard Push Architectures * External push providers are frequently unstable, exhibiting misbehaving instances, sudden disconnections, and unpredictable timeouts. * Naive retry strategies often lead to "retry storms," which quickly exhaust rate-limit quotas and result in HTTP 429 (Too Many Requests) errors. * At massive scales, manual management of hundreds of server connections becomes impossible, necessitating automated decisions on when to abandon or switch between faulty nodes. ## Unified Gateway Design and High-Performance Transport * Pushsphere provides a single entry point for all push platforms, abstracting the complexities of mTLS for Apple and OAuth 2.0 for Firebase. * The system is built on the Armeria microservice framework and utilizes Netty for high-performance, non-blocking communication within the Java Virtual Machine. * The architecture includes a client library and gateway server that support zone-aware routing, ensuring low latency and efficient traffic distribution across data centers. ## Intelligent Retry and Load Balancing Strategies * The "retry-aware" load balancer uses a Round Robin base strategy but is designed to skip previously attempted endpoints during a retry cycle to avoid repeated failures on faulty nodes. * Quota-aware logic monitors rate limits in real-time, preventing the system from retrying endpoints that are nearing their capacity. * These smarter traffic distribution rules balance high delivery success rates with the preservation of provider quotas, preventing service-wide blocking. ## Resilient Endpoint Management via Circuit Breakers * Pushsphere assigns a dedicated circuit breaker to every endpoint to report success and failure rates continuously. * When a circuit opens due to frequent failures, the unhealthy endpoint is immediately removed from the active pool and replaced with a fresh candidate from a DNS-refreshed pool. * This automated replacement mechanism maintains a consistent pool of healthy endpoints, allowing the system to remain stable without manual intervention during hardware or network degradations. Pushsphere has transformed LINE's notification infrastructure, reducing annual on-call alerts from over 30 to just four, despite implementing stricter monitoring thresholds. For developers managing high-volume messaging services, adopting a gateway-based approach with automated circuit breaking and quota awareness is a proven path to achieving carrier-grade reliability.

A new quantum toolkit for optimization (opens in new tab)

Researchers at Google Quantum AI have introduced Decoded Quantum Interferometry (DQI), a new quantum algorithm designed to tackle optimization problems that remain intractable for classical supercomputers. By leveraging the wavelike nature of quantum mechanics to create specific interference patterns, the algorithm converts complex optimization tasks into high-dimensional lattice decoding problems. This breakthrough provides a theoretical framework where large-scale, error-corrected quantum computers could eventually outperform classical methods by several orders of magnitude on commercially relevant tasks. ### Linking Optimization to Lattice Decoding * The DQI algorithm functions by mapping the cost landscape of an optimization problem onto a periodic lattice structure. * The "decoding" aspect involves identifying the nearest lattice element to a specific point in space, a task that becomes exponentially difficult for classical computers as dimensions increase into the hundreds or thousands. * By using quantum interference to bridge these fields, researchers can apply decades of sophisticated classical decoding research—originally developed for data storage and transmission—to solve optimization challenges. * This approach is unique because it requires a quantum computer to leverage these classical decoding algorithms in a way that conventional hardware cannot. ### Solving the Optimal Polynomial Intersection (OPI) Problem * The most significant application of DQI is for the OPI problem, where the goal is to find a low-degree polynomial that intersects the maximum number of given target points. * OPI is a foundational task in data science (polynomial regression), cryptography, and digital error correction, yet it remains "hopelessly difficult" for classical algorithms in many scenarios. * DQI transforms the OPI problem into a task of decoding Reed-Solomon codes, a family of codes widely used in technologies like QR codes and DVDs. * Technical analysis indicates a massive performance gap: certain OPI instances could be solved by a quantum computer in approximately a few million operations, while the most efficient classical algorithms would require over $10^{23}$ (one hundred sextillion) operations. ### Practical Conclusion As quantum hardware moves toward the era of error correction, Decoded Quantum Interferometry identifies a specific class of "NP-hard" problems where quantum machines can provide a clear win. Researchers and industries focusing on cryptography and complex data regression should monitor DQI as a primary candidate for demonstrating the first generation of commercially viable quantum advantage in optimization.

Separating natural forests from other tree cover with AI for deforestation-free supply chains (opens in new tab)

Researchers from Google DeepMind and Google Research have developed "Natural Forests of the World 2020," an AI-powered global map that distinguishes natural ecosystems from commercial tree plantations. By utilizing high-resolution satellite data and machine learning, the project provides a critical 10-meter resolution baseline to support deforestation-free supply chain regulations like the EUDR. This tool enables governments and companies to monitor biodiversity-rich areas with unprecedented accuracy, ensuring that natural forests are protected from industrial degradation. **The Limitation of Traditional Tree Cover Maps** * Existing maps frequently conflate all woody vegetation into a generic "tree cover" category, leading to "apples-to-oranges" comparisons between different land types. * This lack of distinction makes it difficult to differentiate between the harvesting of short-term plantations and the permanent loss of ancient, biodiversity-rich natural forests. * Precise mapping is now a legal necessity due to regulations like the European Union Regulation on Deforestation-free Products (EUDR), which bans products from land deforested or degraded after December 31, 2020. **The MTSViT Modeling Approach** * To accurately identify forest types, researchers developed the Multi-modal Temporal-Spatial Vision Transformer (MTSViT). * Rather than relying on a single snapshot, the AI "observes" 1280 x 1280 meter patches over the course of a year to identify seasonal, spectral, and textural signatures. * The model integrates multi-modal data, including Sentinel-2 satellite imagery, topographical information (such as elevation and slope), and specific geographical coordinates. * This temporal-spatial analysis allows the AI to recognize the complex patterns of natural forests that distinguish them from the uniform, fast-growing structures of commercial plantations. **Dataset Scale and Global Validation** * The model was trained on a massive dataset comprising over 1.2 million global patches at 10-meter resolution. * The final map provides seamless global coverage, achieving a best-in-class validation accuracy of 92.2% against an independent global dataset. * The research was a collaborative effort involving the World Resources Institute and the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis to ensure scientific rigor and practical utility. The "Natural Forests of the World 2020" dataset is publicly available via Google Earth Engine and other open repositories. Organizations should leverage this high-resolution baseline to conduct environmental due diligence, support government monitoring, and target conservation efforts in preparation for global climate milestones like COP30.

Differentially private machine learning at scale with JAX-Privacy (opens in new tab)

Google DeepMind and Google Research have announced the release of JAX-Privacy 1.0, a high-performance library designed to scale differentially private (DP) machine learning. By leveraging JAX’s native parallelization and functional programming model, the toolkit enables researchers to train large-scale foundation models while maintaining rigorous privacy guarantees. This version introduces modular components for advanced algorithms and empirical auditing, making private training both computationally efficient and verifiable across distributed environments. ### Scaling Differential Privacy with JAX * The library is built directly on the JAX ecosystem, integrating seamlessly with Flax for neural network architectures and Optax for optimization. * It utilizes JAX’s `vmap` for automatic vectorization and `shard_map` for single-program multiple-data (SPMD) parallelization, allowing DP primitives to scale across multiple accelerators. * By using just-in-time (JIT) compilation, the library mitigates the traditional performance overhead associated with per-example gradient clipping and noise addition. ### Core Components and Advanced Algorithms * The toolkit provides fundamental building blocks for implementing standard DP algorithms like DP-SGD and DP-FTRL, including specialized modules for data batch construction. * It supports state-of-the-art methods such as DP matrix factorization, which improves performance by injecting correlated noise across training iterations. * Features like micro-batching and padding are included to handle the massive, variable-sized batches often required to achieve an optimal balance between privacy and model utility. ### Verification and Privacy Auditing * JAX-Privacy incorporates rigorous privacy accounting based on Rényi Differential Privacy to provide precise tracking of privacy budgets. * The library includes tools for empirical auditing, allowing developers to validate their privacy guarantees through techniques like membership inference attacks and data poisoning. * The design ensures correctness in distributed settings, specifically focusing on consistent noise generation and gradient synchronization across clusters. JAX-Privacy 1.0 is a robust solution for researchers and engineers who need to deploy production-grade private models. Its modular architecture and integration with high-performance computing primitives make it a primary choice for training foundation models on sensitive datasets without compromising on scalability or security.

Code Quality Improvement Techniques Part 22 (opens in new tab)

The post argues that developers should avoid overriding the `equals` method to compare only a subset of an object’s properties, as this violates the fundamental principles of identity and structural equivalence. Implementing "partial equality" often leads to subtle, hard-to-trace bugs in reactive programming environments where UI updates depend on detecting changes through equality checks. To ensure system reliability, `equals` must strictly represent either referential identity or total structural equivalence. ### Risks of Partial Equality in Reactive UI * Reactive frameworks such as Kotlin’s `StateFlow`, `Flow`, and Android’s `LiveData` utilize `distinctUntilChanged` logic to optimize performance. * These "observable" patterns compare the new object instance with the previous one using `equals`; if the result is `true`, the update is ignored to prevent unnecessary re-rendering. * If a `UserProfileViewData` object only compares a `userId` field, the UI will fail to reflect changes to a user's nickname or profile image because the framework incorrectly assumes the data has not changed. * To avoid this, any comparison logic that only checks specific fields should be moved to a uniquely named function, such as `hasSameIdWith()`, instead of hijacking the standard `equals` method. ### Defining Identity vs. Equivalence * **Identity (Referential Equality):** This indicates that two references point to the exact same object instance, which is the default behavior of `Object.equals()` in Java or `Any.equals()` in Kotlin. * **Equivalence (Structural Equality):** This indicates that two objects are logically the same because all their properties match. In Kotlin, `data class` implementations provide this by default for all parameters defined in the primary constructor. * Proper implementation of equivalence requires that all fields within the object also have clearly defined equality logic. ### Nuances and Implementation Exceptions * **Kotlin Data Class Limitations:** Only properties declared in the primary constructor are included in the compiler-generated `equals` and `hashCode` methods; properties declared in the class body are ignored by default. * **Calculated Caches:** It is acceptable to exclude certain fields from an equality check if they do not change the logical state of the object, such as a `cachedValue` used to store the results of a heavy mathematical operation. * **Context-Dependent Equality:** The definition of equality can change based on the model's purpose. For example, a mathematical model might treat 1/2 and 2/4 as equal, whereas a UI display model might treat them as different because they represent different strings of text. When implementing `equals`, prioritize full structural equivalence to prevent data-stale bugs in reactive systems. If you only need to compare a unique identifier, create a dedicated method instead of repurposing the standard equality check.

Introducing Nested Learning: A new ML paradigm for continual learning (opens in new tab)

Google Research has introduced Nested Learning, a paradigm that treats machine learning models as systems of interconnected, multi-level optimization problems rather than separate architectures and training rules. By unifying structure and optimization through varying update frequencies, this approach aims to mitigate "catastrophic forgetting," the tendency for models to lose old knowledge when acquiring new skills. The researchers validated this framework through "Hope," a self-modifying architecture that outperforms current state-of-the-art models in long-context memory and language modeling. ### The Nested Learning Paradigm This framework shifts the view of machine learning from a single continuous process to a set of coherent, nested optimization problems. Each component within a model is characterized by its own "context flow"—the specific set of information it learns from—and its own update frequency. * The paradigm argues that architecture (structure) and optimization (training rules) are fundamentally the same concept, differing only by their level of computational depth and update rates. * Associative memory is used as a core illustrative concept, where the training process (backpropagation) is modeled as a system mapping data points to local error values. * By defining an update frequency rate for each component, researchers can order these problems into "levels," allowing for a more unified and efficient learning system inspired by the human brain's neuroplasticity. ### Deep Optimizers and Refined Objectives Nested Learning provides a principled way to improve standard optimization algorithms by viewing them through the lens of associative memory modules. * Existing momentum-based optimizers often rely on simple dot-product similarity, which fails to account for how different data samples relate to one another. * By replacing these simple similarities with standard loss metrics, such as L2 regression loss, the researchers derived new formulations for momentum that are more resilient to imperfect or noisy data. * This approach turns the optimizer itself into a deeper learning component with its own internal optimization objective. ### Continuum Memory Systems and the "Hope" Architecture The paradigm addresses the limitations of Large Language Models (LLMs), which are often restricted to either their immediate input window or static pre-trained knowledge. * The researchers developed "Hope," a proof-of-concept architecture that utilizes multi-time-scale updates for its internal components. * While standard Transformers act primarily as short-term memory, the Nested Learning approach allows for "continuum memory" that manages long-context information more effectively. * Experimental results show that this self-modifying architecture achieves superior performance in language modeling compared to existing state-of-the-art models. By recognizing that every part of a model is essentially an optimizer operating at a different frequency, Nested Learning offers a path toward AI that can adapt to new experiences in real-time. This structural shift moves away from the "static pre-training" bottleneck and toward systems capable of true human-like neuroplasticity and lifelong learning.