design

7 posts

toss

Layers of your time : Celebrating the time spent with Toss (opens in new tab)

The article argues that effective internal branding is not about making attractive company merchandise, but about designing meaningful experiences around employees’ time and contributions. Through an eight-month redesign of Toss’s work-anniversary gift, the designer created a layered light that visually represents accumulated years, protected quality despite production delays, and carefully designed the delivery experience. The project concludes that strong internal branding requires a clear reason, end-to-end experience design, and unwavering standards. ## From Merchandise to a Celebration of Time - Toss celebrates employees’ work anniversaries with annual gifts such as medals, wine, and cubes. - Over time, some employees began giving the gifts away, suggesting they had become clutter rather than meaningful keepsakes. - The redesign aimed to: - Sincerely celebrate each employee’s time at the company. - Show appreciation for the six-month gap while the gift was being redesigned. ## Three Criteria for the New Gift The new product had to: - Avoid being immediately stored away in a drawer. - Physically show the accumulation of time. - Remain beautiful whether celebrating one year or ten years. A layered lamp was chosen because employees could add one disk for each anniversary. As the disks accumulated, the layers of light became deeper, making the passage of time visible through the object’s structure. ## Hardware Development and Quality Control - The designer had no previous hardware or lighting-production experience. - The team repeatedly tested: - Disk thickness, including differences as small as 0.5 mm. - The spacing between the lamp body and disks. - Light intensity as more disks were added. - The product was divided into two versions: - White for years 1–10. - Black from year 11 onward, symbolizing the beginning of a new period. - Dozens of defects appeared during final factory inspection. - Rather than compromise quality to meet the schedule, distribution was delayed. - Approximately 5,000 lamps were individually inspected and improved. ## Giving the Product a Warm Voice - The lamp was named **Layered Lighting**. - The phrase **“Layers of your time at toss”** was engraved on the lamp and packaging. - The communication emphasized remembrance and celebration rather than corporate motivation. - Serif typography, carefully matched packaging, and handwritten name cards created a warmer, more personal experience. ## Designing the Moment of Delivery - Instead of asking employees to pick up their gifts, the team placed them directly at employees’ desks. - The redesigned process gave employees the correct number of disks for their accumulated tenure. - The intended experience was: - Discovering the gift on a Monday morning. - Opening the box and reacting with surprise. - Taking photos and sharing the moment with colleagues. - Over one weekend, the team placed gifts at 2,500 desks among approximately 3,900 employees. - The operation took 26 hours. - Employee photos and reactions spread across Slack and Instagram, including one memorable comment: “I now have a reason to stay another year.” ## Principles of Good Internal Branding - **Start with the reason:** Every object or graphic should clearly communicate why it exists. - **Design the experience, not just the object:** The interaction begins before the product is opened and includes how it is received and shared. - **Protect the standard until the end:** Internal projects are easy to compromise because their results may not be immediately visible, making a clear standard essential. Good internal branding helps employees feel that they belong to a good team. That sense of belonging can strengthen engagement and ultimately improve the quality of the work they create.

figma

Why development leaders are investing in design | Figma Blog (opens in new tab)

Design has become a strategic driver of software success, not merely a visual layer added at the end of development. An IDC study of more than 500 development leaders found that teams prioritizing design report stronger business outcomes, faster delivery, and better collaboration. The research also shows that human design expertise is increasingly important as AI accelerates product creation. ## The Business Case for Design - 75% of development leaders consider design “very” or “extremely important” to modern software development. - Leaders who rated design as “extremely important” were five times more likely to say their last project far exceeded expectations. - The main business benefits associated with design investment were: - Improved customer retention - Higher customer engagement - Increased product innovation - Design now influences customer satisfaction, employee productivity, accessibility, and data-driven decision-making. ## Designer–Developer Collaboration - 52% of leaders said their organizations have increased software output over the past two years. - Collaboration between design and development from the beginning of a project helps teams: - Align on scope and trade-offs earlier - Reduce rework and friction - Iterate in real time - Improve morale and time to market - Among respondents, stronger design collaboration led to: - More innovation for 54% - Better customer experiences for 47% - Faster time to market for 43% - Effective collaboration was described as synchronized, structured, and mutually supportive rather than divided into isolated handoffs. ## Design Expertise in AI-Driven Development - AI makes it easier to create initial concepts, but generated outputs still require substantial human refinement. - Designers provide essential oversight in: - Quality control - User experience - Brand consistency - Cross-functional review - 80% of development leaders said design has become more important to the success of AI-powered products than it was two years ago. - The strongest teams treat AI output as a starting point, not a finished product. Human judgment is needed to turn fast-generated concepts into usable, user-centered experiences. Organizations seeking an advantage should treat design as a business priority, integrate designers and developers throughout the development process, establish scalable design practices, and preserve human oversight of AI-generated work.

figma

Double Click: Does Efficiency Kill Love? | Figma Blog (opens in new tab)

Config 2025 framed AI less as a tool for maximizing efficiency and more as a way to deepen connection, care, and creative purpose. The article contrasts the slogan “Efficiency kills love” with the idea that “Design is chasing a feeling,” arguing that craft and intentionality should remain central as technology accelerates. AI’s role, therefore, depends on the values people choose to embed in it. ## From Efficiency to Care - Figma’s community expressed renewed enthusiasm for craft, emotion, and meaningful creative work. - Smith & Diction’s presentation, “The Wild West of Collaborative Brand Design,” captured the mood with the declaration that “Efficiency kills love.” - Figma CEO Dylan Field’s keynote offered a complementary idea: “Design is chasing a feeling.” - Together, these statements suggest a shift away from treating productivity and speed as the sole measures of successful design. ## Craft as the Conduit - Yang You, Head of Design at Paradigm, summarized the emerging attitude: “Craft is king, and care is the conduit.” - Designers are looking beyond target metrics and faster workflows toward: - Storytelling - Purposeful making - Emotional resonance - A sense of magic and meaning - Microsoft design leader Brittany Mederos similarly described Config’s theme as making meaningful things with purpose. ## Technology Should Reflect Human Values - Madeline Gannon argued that automation is not inevitable; it is intentional and reflects collective cultural choices. - This reframes AI from an unstoppable force into a technology shaped by human decisions about what should—and should not—be automated. - The central question becomes not simply what AI can make faster, but what people want to create with it and why. ## Slowing Down in an Automated World - Polaroid’s approach illustrates how technology can support, rather than replace, human creativity. - Its app provides AI-powered photography advice while preserving the company’s emphasis on slowing down, making physical things, and creating objects with personal meaning. - The example suggests that even advanced tools can reinforce deliberate, hands-on experiences instead of eliminating them. Ultimately, the article recommends treating AI as an augmentation of creative practice rather than an automatic substitute for it. Efficiency is valuable, but designers should protect the care, craft, and emotional intent that make creative work meaningful.

figma

Double click: Human Takes on Agentic AI | Figma Blog (opens in new tab)

Agentic AI could fundamentally change UX by handling tasks across apps with minimal supervision, reducing the need for users to navigate complex interfaces. Supporters see agents as a new abstraction layer that lets people focus on goals rather than buttons, menus, and tabs. However, the shift also raises concerns about designing for machines at the expense of human creativity, agency, and meaningful interaction. ## The Promise of Agentic AI - Agents can take routine work off users’ plates, such as paying bills or completing multistep tasks. - Perplexity’s Henry Modisett argues that AI should be “how something works,” not necessarily what users directly interact with. - The ideal experience resembles starting a car: users specify where they want to go without needing to understand the machinery underneath. - Agentic systems may reduce the cognitive load associated with chatbots, personalities, and complicated interfaces. ## Agents as a New Web Abstraction - Agents could operate across platforms, creating a more interoperable web that works more like human workflows. - They may reduce the need to navigate menus, manage open tabs, or repeatedly switch between applications. - Rather than one all-purpose AI, the future may involve specialized agents collaborating like a team. - This could shift users’ attention from browsing and operating software toward creating, connecting, and pursuing goals. ## Designing Websites for Machines - Maintaining and optimizing websites for AI agents could become a distinct industry. - Websites may increasingly prioritize: - Clean APIs - Machine-readable content - Clear structure - Streamlined navigation - Visual polish, animations, and pixel-perfect layouts may matter less to agents than accessibility and functional interoperability. - Designers and developers must consider whether they are primarily building for humans, machines, or both. ## Preserving Human Creativity - Optimizing exclusively for AI could flatten the web and remove creativity, depth, and intentional visual experiences. - The growth of agentic systems arrives alongside renewed interest in: - Creative coding - Handcrafted websites - Experiences that move beyond templates - The industry has an opportunity to decide which tedious work to automate while preserving the aspects of the web that feel expressive and distinctly human. ## The Value of Friction and User Control - Traditional UX often treats friction as something to eliminate, but autonomous agents complicate that principle. - Users need deliberate moments to: - Review an agent’s proposed action - Approve consequential changes - Correct mistakes - Stay aware of what the system is doing - Carefully reintroduced friction can preserve agency and trust, even when the agent performs most of the work. - Good agentic design may therefore prioritize appropriate checkpoints over completely invisible automation. Agentic AI is still in its early stages, but it is likely to reshape both web infrastructure and interface design. The strongest approach is to automate complexity while preserving human oversight, creativity, and opportunities for meaningful participation.

figma

Explore the value of play through a new zine | Figma Blog (opens in new tab)

Finding room for play is presented as an essential part of design, helping people stay curious, experiment, and discover unexpected solutions. To explore this idea, Figma and It’s Nice That created *The Playbook*, a printed zine combining essays, advice, visual commissions, and hands-on activities. Debuted at Config 2023, it encourages readers to treat play and iteration as practical parts of creative work. ## A Collaboration About Play - *The Playbook* was produced jointly by Figma and It’s Nice That. - It explores spontaneous thinking, curiosity, and experimentation across different design practices. - The publication reflects Figma’s belief that play supports learning and helps collaborators connect ideas. ## Essays on Iteration and Collaboration - Figma Chief Product Officer Yuhki Yamashita discusses how to embrace endless iteration and work productively while ideas remain in flux. - Chief Technology Officer Kris Rasmussen examines collaborative engineering, arguing that engineers should work beyond strict role boundaries. - Together, the essays present iteration and cross-functional collaboration as central to modern product development. ## Creative Advice and Rules for Play - The zine features conversations with creatives about staying curious when possibilities feel unlimited. - Paula Scher contributes ten rules for play drawn from her career, including advice on sketching, influence, and creative experimentation. - The publication encourages readers to look for “what if?” moments that can unlock new directions. ## Interactive Activities and Visual Commissions - Readers can onboard themselves into the zine and take a quiz about their meeting-hosting style. - A design challenge built around “How might we?” offers a hands-on break from reading. - Shawna X visualizes a “lightbulb moment” in a risograph print. - Manshen Lo interprets Bruno Munari’s 12-step design methodology. - The publication combines essays and activities with a range of playful visual work. ## Printed Format and Config Debut - The Playbook was printed as an A5 zine and wrapped in compostable cellophane. - Two essays by Yamashita and Rasmussen appeared together in a complementary A6 zine. - Copies were distributed to Config 2023 attendees when they arrived. *The Playbook* treats play not as a distraction from serious design work, but as a method for learning, collaborating, and generating better ideas. Its combination of reflection and practical exercises encourages designers and teams to make experimentation a regular part of their process.

figma

Nominate photography for the 2018 Unsplash Awards | Figma Blog (opens in new tab)

Unsplash’s 2018 Awards celebrated the photographers whose free contributions helped build the platform’s alternative to traditional stock photography. The awards featured 13 categories, with selected images showcased throughout November and December and judged for overall excellence. Photographers could submit entries through December 7, 2018. ## Unsplash’s Contribution to Stock Photography - Founded in 2013, Unsplash challenged conventional stock photography with a curated collection of high-quality, freely shared images. - Its success depended on photographers’ generosity, skill, and willingness to contribute their work. - The awards were created to recognize and thank these contributors. ## 2018 Award Categories - Aerial photography - Animals and wildlife - Astrophotography - Black and white - Food and drink - Interiors and architecture - Mobile photography - Nature and landscapes - People and portraits - Sports - Street photography - Tech and business - Unsplash community ## Submission and Judging - Submissions were open through **December 7, 2018**. - Unsplash planned to feature work across the categories during November and December. - Judges selected the best featured image in each category. - Entrants could consult Unsplash’s Awards page for category definitions, judge information, and evaluation criteria. Photographers interested in participating were encouraged to submit their work through the Unsplash Awards website.

figma

How one designer finds inspiration in rabble rousers like Bart Simpson | Figma Blog (opens in new tab)

Linda Eliasen, Head of Design at Help Scout, draws creative energy from unconventional figures who challenge social rules and expectations. Her inspirations—from Bart Simpson to SNL comedians and Carl Sagan—helped her question conformity, reject restrictive ideas about femininity, and bring greater imagination and technical curiosity to her design work. ## Inspiration as a Creative Force - Eliasen rejects the idea that inspiration is entirely controllable or predictable. - She humorously describes inspiration as an almost supernatural force that arrives when artists keep showing up and working. - This view separates personal ego from creative results: success belongs to inspiration, while failure does not define the artist. - Her creative development was shaped by discovering broader worlds beyond her conservative hometown in Fayetteville, Georgia. ## Bart Simpson: Questioning the Rules - Bart Simpson encouraged Eliasen to imagine life beyond obedience and conformity. - As a shy, anxious child, she identified with Bart’s willingness to challenge: - His parents - Authority figures such as Chief Wiggum - School bullies and social expectations - Bart represented the freedom to say and do things she privately wished she could. - Learning that Bart was voiced by Nancy Cartwright added another layer of appeal, suggesting a playful challenge to traditional ideas about masculinity and identity. ## The Women of *Saturday Night Live*: Rejecting the “Pretty Girl” Ideal - SNL performers showed Eliasen that women could be funny, strange, messy, imaginative, and publicly expressive. - Growing up, she had limited access to female role models who pursued unconventional ambitions such as sports, architecture, comedy, or space exploration. - Social expectations emphasized being attractive, polite, thin, charming, and non-confrontational. - Performers including Cheri Oteri, Molly Shannon, Maya Rudolph, Tina Fey, Kristen Wiig, and Amy Poehler challenged those expectations through: - Ridiculous costumes and physical comedy - Unattractive or exaggerated appearances - Absurd characters - Bold, unconventional humor - Their example helped Eliasen see that women did not need to fit a polished, traditionally feminine ideal to succeed or take center stage. ## Carl Sagan: Expanding Technical Curiosity - Sagan’s writing opened new intellectual directions for Eliasen. - His ideas influenced her to incorporate more technical qualities into her creative work. - She describes discovering his essays as a transformative experience that brought renewed energy and possibility to her design practice. - Sagan represents inspiration through science, wonder, and curiosity rather than conventional artistic sources. Eliasen’s examples suggest that creative inspiration can come from rebellious humor, unconventional role models, and scientific exploration. Designers can expand their work by seeking influences that challenge inherited assumptions and make room for more playful, curious, and individual perspectives.